Characteristics of liver injury in cases of COVID-19.

In novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), liver injury was found at a high rate, and reports from outside Japan revealed that such injury was related to severity. We examined the characteristics of liver injury in 15 cases of COVID-19. Thirteen of these patients received antiviral therapy, such as favipiravir, remdesivir, and hydroxychloroquine. Liver injury was observed in eight cases at admission for COVID-19. The hepatic CT attenuation values at admission were significantly lower in nine patients who developed liver damage or showed its exacerbation during the treatment than in the remaining patients. Drug-induced liver injury due to antiviral drug was suspected in six cases. Liver injury due to COVID-19 may be related to low hepatic CT attenuation values and be modified by antiviral drugs.Copyright © 2021 The Japan Society of Hepatology.

A case of possible drug-induced liver injury due to COVID-19 vaccine.

The patient presented with nausea, appetite loss, and fatigue. She had received two doses of Pfizer/BioN-Tech BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (COMIRNATY) for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Acute liver injury was noted 14 days after the first dose of the vaccine. Re-exposure through the second dose worsened the liver injury. After liver biopsy on the third day of admission, methylprednisolone (1000 mg) was administered. Liver histology showed acute hepatitis with diffuse lobular inflammation/necrosis and lymphocyte-dominant infiltra-tion in the portal areas. The patient was diagnosed with drug-induced liver injury due to the COVID-19 vaccine based on the Digestive Disease Week Japan 2004 (DDW-J) scale, which assesses the temporal relationship, liver biopsy, and laboratory findings. With improvements in the blood test parameters, prednisolone was gradually tapered and stopped. One month later, no biochemical signs of relapse were noted. To our knowledge, this is the first report describing liver injury after the administration of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in Japan.Copyright © 2022 The Japan Society of Hepatology.

Liver injury in patients with COVID-19 who received dexamethasone monotherapy

Introduction: Liver injury is frequently seen in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and it has been reported to be associated with the severity of COVID-19. The direct action of the virus, cytokine storm, coagulation abnormalities, drug-induced, etc. are considered to be the causes of liver injury, and antiviral agents against COVID-19 and steroids used as anti-inflammatory agents have also been reported to contribute to the appearance of liver injury. In Japan, remdesivir, dexamethasone (Dex), baricitinib, etc. are used as therapeutic agents for COVID-19, but there is still not enough evidence about the frequency of liver injury as an adverse event. Aims & Methods: This study aimed to clarify the influence of Dex monotherapy for liver injury in COVID-19 with respiratory failure. We examined 171 patients with COVID-19 with liver injury in the respiratory failure groups and the nonrespiratory failure groups and investigated 41 patients with moderate COVID-19 with respiratory failure who received Dex monotherapy in the liver injury group and the nonliver injury group at the time before treatment. Result(s): The respiratory failure group had 64% more liver damage than the non-respiratory failure group, was older, had more men, and had significantly more complications of lifestyle-related diseases such as hypertension and diabetes. Obesity was more common in the liver injury group prior to Dex monotherapy, and the liver CT value was significantly lower than in the non-liver injury group. Liver injury worsened in 41% of patients after Dex monotherapy, but there was no significant difference in the frequency before Dex monotherapy between the liver injury group and the non-liver injury group, and the degree of liver injury was mild in all cases, improving in 38% of the liver injury group. Conclusion(s): Dex monotherapy was a safe treatment for moderate COVID-19 with respiratory failure, which frequently resulted in liver injury.

A case of possible drug-induced liver injury due to COVID-19 vaccine

The patient presented with nausea, appetite loss, and fatigue. She had received two doses of Pfizer/BioN-Tech BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine (COMIRNATYR) for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Acute liver injury was noted 14 days after the first dose of the vaccine. Re-exposure through the second dose worsened the liver injury. After liver biopsy on the third day of admission, methylprednisolone (1000 mg) was administered. Liver histology showed acute hepatitis with diffuse lobular inflammation/necrosis and lymphocyte-dominant infiltra-tion in the portal areas. The patient was diagnosed with drug-induced liver injury due to the COVID-19 vaccine based on the Digestive Disease Week Japan 2004 (DDW-J) scale, which assesses the temporal relationship, liver biopsy, and laboratory findings. With improvements in the blood test parameters, prednisolone was gradually tapered and stopped. One month later, no biochemical signs of relapse were noted. To our knowledge, this is the first report describing liver injury after the administration of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in Japan. Copyright © 2022 The Japan Society of Hepatology.

Japan prospective multicenter study for optimization of COVID-19 vaccinations based on the immune response and safety profile in Inflammatory Bowel Disease patients: Interim analyses of the J-COMBAT trial

Background Immune responses to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination may be influenced by immunomodulatory drugs (IMDs). We investigated the immune responses and safety in fully vaccinated Japanese patients with IBD. Methods IBD patients and control subjects at 39 institutes were invited to participate in the study from March to October 2021. Blood sample collections to measure anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG antibody titers were planned pre-1st vaccination, pre-2nd vaccination, and at 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-2nd vaccination. Immune responses were compared between groups, considering baseline characteristics and IMD treatments. (UMIN000043545) The interim analyses presented here include mainly data from the 4-weeks post-2nd vaccination time-point. Results In total, 679 IBD patients and 203 controls were enrolled (Table 1). The IBD group received the BNT162b2 vaccine (86.2%) and the mRNA-1273 vaccine (12.5%), and the control group received the BNT162b2 vaccine (86.9%) and the mRNA-1273 vaccine (12.1%). Only 4 cases (0.7%) in the IBD group and 2 (1.0%) in the control group were infected with COVID-19. Adverse events of 2nd vaccination occurred in 48.4% of the IBD group and 35.1% of the control group. Comparison between administrated and non-administrated IBD patients for each IMD revealed an attenuated genomic mean titer (GMT [U/mL]) in those taking systemic steroids (18.85 vs 31.24), anti-TNF monotherapy (28.31 vs 42.99), anti-TNF therapy+ immunomodulator (IM) (12.86 vs 35.26), vedolizumab+IM (19.49 vs 30.39), ustekinumab+IM (20.44 vs 30.79), and tofacitinib (9.54 vs 32.08), but not in those taking oral 5-ASA (29.50 vs 32.40), or vedolizumab (41.85 vs 40.20) and ustekinumab (55.56 vs 39.26) monotherapies. Estimated least square means of the GMT by a multiple linear regression model are shown in Table 2. GMTs were significantly influenced by increasing age and allergy (51.2, 95%CI 42.1–62.3;p=0.0293), and tended to be influenced by COVID-19 infection (139.1, 41.0–472.2;p=0.0572). Sex, smoking, drinking, IBD, and adverse events of 2nd vaccination did not affect the GMT. The GMT was significantly higher for mRNA-1273 (90.3 [60.8–134.1]) than for BNT162b2 (39.6 [35.2–44.6], p= 0.0001). Systemic steroids (22.9 [13.9–37.7], p=0.0119), IM (24.2 [18.7–31.4], p<0.0001), anti-TNF agents (20.8 [15.3–28.3], p<0.0001), vedolizumab (25.2 [15.0–42.2], p=0.0409), ustekinumab (28.9 [18.5–45.0], p=0.0754), and tofacitinib (5.5 [2.8–10.9], p<0.0001), but not oral 5-ASA (39.1 [31.9–47.9], p=0.3225), attenuated GMTs at 4 weeks post-2nd vaccination (Table 2). Conclusion Aging and most IMD options attenuated immunogenicity in fully vaccinated IBD patients. Prioritization of a booster vaccination should be considered for IBD patients treated with IMDs.

JAPAN PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER STUDY FOR OPTIMIZATION OF COVID-19 VACCINATIONS BASED ON THE IMMUNE RESPONSE AND SAFETY PROFILE IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE PATIENTS: INTERIM ANALYSES

Background: Immune responses to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination may be influenced by immunomodulatory drugs (IMDs). We investigated the immune responses and safety in fully vaccinated Japanese patients with IBD. Subjects and Methods: IBD patients and control subjects at 39 institutes were invited to participate in the study from March to October 2021. Blood sample collections to measure anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG antibody titers were planned pre-1st vaccination, pre-2nd vaccination, and at 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-2nd vaccination. Immune responses were compared between groups, considering baseline characteristics and IMD treatments. (UMIN000043545) The interim analyses presented here include mainly data from the 4-weeks post-2nd vaccination time-point. Results: In total, 679 IBD patients and 203 controls were enrolled (Table 1). The IBD group received the BNT162b2 vaccine (86.2%) and the mRNA-1273 vaccine (12.5%), and the control group received the BNT162b2 vaccine (86.9%) and the mRNA-1273 vaccine (12.1%). Only 4 cases (0.7%) in the IBD group and 2 (1.0%) in the control group were infected with COVID-19. Adverse events of 2nd vaccination occurred in 48.4% of the IBD group and 35.1% of the control group. Comparison between administrated and non-administrated IBD patients for each IMD revealed an attenuated genomic mean titer (GMT [U/mL]) in those taking systemic steroids (18.85 vs 31.24), anti-TNF monotherapy (28.31 vs 42.99), anti- TNF therapy+ immunomodulator (IM) (12.86 vs 35.26), vedolizumab+IM (19.49 vs 30.39), ustekinumab+IM (20.44 vs 30.79), and tofacitinib (9.54 vs 32.08), but not in those taking oral 5-ASA (29.50 vs 32.40), or vedolizumab (41.85 vs 40.20) and ustekinumab (55.56 vs 39.26) monotherapies. Estimated least square means of the GMT by a multiple linear regression model are shown in Table 2. GMTs were significantly influenced by increasing age and allergy (51.2, 95%CI 42.1-62.3;p=0.0293), and tended to be influenced by COVID- 19 infection (139.1, 41.0-472.2;p=0.0572). Sex, smoking, drinking, IBD, and adverse events of 2nd vaccination did not affect the GMT. The GMT was significantly higher for mRNA- 1273 (90.3 [60.8-134.1]) than for BNT162b2 (39.6 [35.2-44.6], p= 0.0001). Systemic steroids (22.9 [13.9-37.7], p=0.0119), IM (24.2 [18.7-31.4], p<0.0001), anti-TNF agents (20.8 [15.3-28.3], p<0.0001), vedolizumab (25.2 [15.0-42.2], p=0.0409), ustekinumab (28.9 [18.5-45.0], p=0.0754), and tofacitinib (5.5 [2.8-10.9], p<0.0001), but not oral 5- ASA (39.1 [31.9-47.9], p=0.3225), attenuated GMTs at 4 weeks post-2nd vaccination (Table 2). Conclusion: Aging and most IMD options attenuated immunogenicity in fully vaccinated IBD patients. Prioritization of a booster vaccination should be considered for IBD patients treated with IMDs. (Table Presented) (Table Presented)

Japan prospective multicenter study for optimization of COVID-19 vaccinations based on the immune response and safety profile in Inflammatory Bowel Disease patients: Interim analyses of the J-COMBAT trial

Background: Immune responses to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination may be influenced by immunomodulatory drugs (IMDs). We investigated the immune responses and safety in fully vaccinated Japanese patients with IBD. Methods: IBD patients and control subjects at 39 institutes were invited to participate in the study from March to October 2021. Blood sample collections to measure anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG antibody titers were planned pre-1st vaccination, pre-2nd vaccination, and at 4 weeks, 3 months and 6 months post-2nd vaccination. Immune responses were compared between groups, considering baseline characteristics and IMD treatments. (UMIN000043545) The interim analyses presented here include mainly data from the 4-weeks post-2nd vaccination time-point. Results: In total, 679 IBD patients and 203 controls were enrolled (Table 1). The IBD group received the BNT162b2 vaccine (86.2%) and the mRNA-1273 vaccine (12.5%), and the control group received the BNT162b2 vaccine (86.9%) and the mRNA-1273 vaccine (12.1%). Only 4 cases (0.7%) in the IBD group and 2 (1.0%) in the control group were infected with COVID-19. Adverse events of 2nd vaccination occurred in 48.4% of the IBD group and 35.1% of the control group. Comparison between administrated and nonadministrated IBD patients for each IMD revealed an attenuated genomic mean titer (GMT [U/mL]) in those taking systemic steroids (18.85 vs 31.24), anti-TNF monotherapy (28.31 vs 42.99), anti-TNF therapy+ immunomodulator (IM) (12.86 vs 35.26), vedolizumab+IM (19.49 vs 30.39), ustekinumab+IM (20.44 vs 30.79), and tofacitinib (9.54 vs 32.08), but not in those taking oral 5-ASA (29.50 vs 32.40), or vedolizumab (41.85 vs 40.20) and ustekinumab (55.56 vs 39.26) monotherapies. Estimated least square means of the GMT by a multiple linear regression model are shown in Table 2. GMTs were significantly influenced by increasing age and allergy (51.2, 95%CI 42.1-62.3;p=0.0293), and tended to be influenced by COVID-19 infection (139.1, 41.0-472.2;p=0.0572). Sex, smoking, drinking, IBD, and adverse events of 2nd vaccination did not affect the GMT. The GMT was significantly higher for mRNA-1273 (90.3 [60.8-134.1]) than for BNT162b2 (39.6 [35.2-44.6], p= 0.0001). Systemic steroids (22.9 [13.9-37.7], p=0.0119), IM (24.2 [18.7-31.4], p<0.0001), anti-TNF agents (20.8 [15.3-28.3], p<0.0001), vedolizumab (25.2 [15.0-42.2], p=0.0409), ustekinumab (28.9 [18.5-45.0], p=0.0754), and tofacitinib (5.5 [2.8-10.9], p<0.0001), but not oral 5-ASA (39.1 [31.9-47.9], p=0.3225), attenuated GMTs at 4 weeks post-2nd vaccination (Table 2). Conclusion: Aging and most IMD options attenuated immunogenicity in fully vaccinated IBD patients. Prioritization of a booster vaccination should be considered for IBD patients treated with IMDs.